Employers should ensure the scope of a disciplinary investigation it carries out is carefully considered before the investigation begins and is notified to the employee being investigated, and the investigation does not go beyond scope - or risk subsequent dismissals being ruled unfair, following a tribunal ruling.
Parties varying a contract should ensure that if there is an ‘entire agreement’ clause they fully define all terms used in the variation, or risk disputes over whether the changes are sufficiently certain to be legally binding; and whether extrinsic evidence is admissible to explain what they mean, a recent case clarifies.
Householders and others applying for planning permission for developments that may block or reduce the amount of sunlight reaching solar panels on neighbouring property should consider whether their neighbour could apply to have planning permission overturned.
Landowners involved in negotiations or transactions involving matters registered at the Land Registry should ensure they record the necessary changes at the Registry as soon as possible, or risk being unable to do so later, a recent ruling clarifies.
Parties to a contract should ensure it is comprehensive and clearly and unambiguously expressed, to avoid disputes about what it means or whether additional terms should be implied into it, a recent ruling makes clear.
Employers should be aware that issues raised by a worker in relation to their personal situation, such as issues relating to their work performance, can amount to protected disclosures (ie, whistleblowing) if the worker reasonably believes raising them is in the public interest.
Employers whose workforce include individuals with strong beliefs about Scottish independence, Brexit or similar issues should beware treating them less favourably than other workers because of those beliefs, or risk a discrimination claim on grounds of philosophical belief, following a recent ruling.
Employers faced with an employee who has a work-related disability cannot assume that dismissal – so removal from the cause of their disability - will mean the disability ceases for the purpose of calculating whether the disability is likely to have a long-term effect on them, a Tribunal has ruled.