Case law: Court rejects husband’s argument that wife’s expectation of significant future inheritance was a ‘resource’ of hers on divorce
A divorcing spouse should not assume that the other spouse’s prospects of inheriting significant wealth, even if virtually certain, will be taken into account when negotiating a financial settlement on divorce.
This update was published in Legal Alert - November 2018
Legal Alert is a monthly checklist from Atom Content Marketing highlighting new and pending laws, regulations, codes of practice and rulings that could have an impact on your business.
The wife in divorce proceedings had an extremely wealthy father. Due to ‘forced heirship’ laws in her family’s country, there was a clear prospect she would inherit a great deal of money from him when he died. The husband argued that this was a ‘resource’ of hers, and which should be taken into account when the court was deciding on the appropriate financial settlement between them.
The Court of Appeal rejected this argument. It said that she would not necessarily receive her inheritance for many years, and there was no legal duty on the father under English law to give her anything before then, so it would not be right to make her reliant on him to do so.
In any event, that "sat uncomfortably with contemporary mores", as it would significantly restrict her independence.
- A divorcing spouse should not assume that the other spouse’s prospects of inheriting significant wealth, even if virtually certain, will be taken into account when agreeing a financial settlement on divorce.
Case re: Hayat Alireza v Hossam Radwan  EWCA Civ1545
Disclaimer: This article from Atom Content Marketing is for general guidance only, for businesses in the United Kingdom governed by the laws of England. Atom Content Marketing, expert contributors and ICAEW (as distributor) disclaim all liability for any errors or omissions.
Copyright © Atom Content Marketing