ICAEW.com works better with JavaScript enabled.

The problem with passive shareholder voting

Recently, investors have started to embrace the idea that a broad-based indexing strategy is superior to picking stocks or active funds. Due to this, millions have abandoned active funds in favour of passive funds. Dorothy Lund examines the problems with passive shareholder voting

FS Jul Aug 2019 - Passive voting image Investors have begun to embrace the reality that academics have been championing for decades – that a broad-based indexing strategy is superior to picking stocks or actively managed mutual funds. As a result, millions of investors have abandoned actively managed mutual funds, or active funds, in favour of passively managed funds, or passive funds.

In 2018, US investors withdrew $174bn from active funds while investing $207bn into passive funds, continuing a trend that has been ongoing for several years. By the end of 2018, the amount of assets invested in US passive equity funds nearly equaled the amount in US active funds and it is predicted to surpass that amount any day now.


Continue reading

This content is not freely available. To access 'The problem with passive shareholder voting' you need to be one of the following:

ACA student

This content is available to ACA students. If you want to start the ACA qualification there are several routes you can take

Business and Finance Professional

An internationally recognised designation and professional status from the ICAEW.

Financial Services Faculty: Investment Management

Expert analysis, specialist support and trusted technical guidance for investment management professionals.