Government abandons Audit Reform Bill
The now-defunct Audit and Corporate Governance Reform Bill had, among other reforms, aimed to create a new definition of public interest entity, to hold company directors to account for existing corporate reporting responsibilities and to create a new regulator with stronger powers.
According to Department for Business and Trade the decision to scrap the Bill was made to “avoid significant new costs" for large organisations.
A letter from the Minister for Small Business and Economic Transformation, Blair McDougall, to the Chair of the parliamentary Business and Trade Committee, confirmed that with growth and the reduction of administrative burdens key priorities, that it would “not be right” to prioritise the introduction of measures that would increase costs for businesses.
“We intend to focus instead on the simplification and modernisation of corporate reporting. We want to make the UK’s reporting regime the most streamlined and proportionate in the world,” he wrote.
Another key factor in the decision, according to McDougall, was the progress in audit quality and regulation since the collapse of Carillion.
ICAEW’s Chief Executive, Alan Vallance, said: "We cannot hide our disappointment that after many false dawns, the government has decided to scrap the Bill. The government had itself recognised that an Audit Reform Bill would increase global investor confidence in UK companies and increase the prospects of growth."
“Nevertheless, with the changes the profession has made, audit quality and firm governance and resilience are in a very different and vastly improved place from where they were in 2018.”
The final piece in the puzzle is to give the Financial Reporting Council as regulator all the tools it needs to carry out its job. We offer to continue to work with the government to ensure the UK is the best place in the world to attract global investment."
Resources and support to help auditors keep up to date on audit quality, as well as the latest thoughts on quality management standards ISQM 1, ISQM 1 and ISA 220.
Your membership: Audit and assurance resources
Whether you’re looking for support on ISA 600, guidance on improving audit documentation or real-world insights into how AI is being used in audits, ICAEW offers exclusive resources for members.
Raising audit quality worldwide: Duncan Wiggetts on taking Crossing the Line on tour
As the film's writer and Chief Officer Professional Standards, Duncan Wiggetts shares his reflections following his international tour showcasing our latest audit training film, Crossing the Line. His insights reveal why the film is fast becoming a key educational resource across the profession and how storytelling continues to support ICAEW's commitment to improvement regulation.
Provision 29
Read insights from members of the Audit Committee Chairs’ Independent Forum (ACCIF) about how their organisations are approaching implementing Provision 29.
Will Provision 29 prove valuable?
The first in a five-part Corporate Governance Community series looking at Provision 29, this article considers how it can be a source of business value when approached by boards in the right way.
How to define material controls for Provision 29
In the second Corporate Governance Community article on Provision 29, experienced audit committee chairs share the three key questions boards are asking about defining and matching principal risks and material controls.
Provision 29 dry runs: a way to engage the board?
As part of the Corporate Governance Community’s Provision 29 series, this article examines the merits of conducting a dry run ahead of next year’s declaration and considers the role of audit committee chairs in engaging the full board.
Thought Leadership: the future of audit
Audit quality: how to raise the bar
What steps can and should audit committees, audit regulators, investors and auditors in the UK take to improve audit quality? This essay from the Audit and Assurance Faculty examines audit quality in terms of ownership, behavioural aspects, and structural drivers.
User-driven assurance: fresh thinking
With calls for better engagement between auditors and users, we recommend the application of a three "pillar" model of what we call "User-Driven Assurance"; a new way of thinking about assurance, directed in its first phase by the needs of the primary user – the shareholders.
Internal control effectiveness: who needs to know?
Reporting on the effectiveness of controls over financial reporting features prominently in the current reviews of UK audit and regulation. This essay explores the current position in the UK, compares it with what happens in the USA and elsewhere in the world, and sets out the case for change and potential options.
Internal controls reporting: sketching out the options
What might a future framework for reporting on internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) look like? This essay from the Audit and Assurance Faculty examines various reporting frameworks, including COSO and the UK Code, as well as how these fit in with Sir Donald Brydon’s recommendations.