In this session, Alex Edmans, Author and Professor of Finance at London Business School talked about the future of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) and his proposal to shift both the term and the practice to ‘rational sustainability’. See his full article here.
ESG is under attack from all sides. True believers wish to keep practicing ESG but call it something different; opportunists recognize that an ESG label no longer helps launch funds or attract customers; opponents seek to ban ESG outright.
But if ESG is to be scrapped, what do we replace it with? Retiring the term but continuing the practice fails to address the legitimate challenges to ESG; abandoning the practice throws the baby out with the bathwater.
This article proposes an alternative: “Rational Sustainability”. Sustainability refers to the goal – the creation of long-term value rather than the ticking of ESG boxes – which is of interest to all job titles and political leanings. Rational refers to the approach: it recognises diminishing returns and trade-offs; it is based on evidence and analysis; and guards against irrational sustainability bubbles.
Rational Sustainability is not a rebranding or a name change, but a fundamental shift in the practice of ESG to the informed creation of long-term value.
Rational Sustainability has ten features, the first five focusing on “sustainability” and the second five on “rational”:
- Rational Sustainability is About Value Creation, not Politics.
- Rational Sustainability is About Outcomes, not Labels.
- Rational Sustainability is Intrinsic, not Instrumental.
- Rational Sustainability is Core, not Peripheral.
- Rational Sustainability is Enabling, not Prescriptive.
- Rational Sustainability Builds on Evidence and Analysis.
- Rational Sustainability Recognizes Diminishing Returns and Trade-Offs.
- Rational Sustainability Sets Boundaries.
- Rational Sustainability Guards Against Irrationality.
- Rational Sustainability Challenges and Questions.