ICAEW.com works better with JavaScript enabled.

The differences between the IESBA and ICAEW Codes of Ethics

Author:

Published: 09 Nov 2021

Comparisons between the ICAEW and IESBA codes of ethics.

Background

ICAEW’s Code of Ethics is based on the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants of the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) published by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) in 2018 and is used with permission of IFAC.

The IESBA Code has adopted the principles-based approach pioneered by ICAEW. Additional guidance (indicated in the Code in italics) is included by ICAEW in areas that have been found to be of particular relevance to our members in the past or reflecting the particular environment in the UK.

We are obliged to adopt the IESBA Code in full, and are not permitted to change their provisions, only add to them.

Historically there has been a substantial amount of ICAEW-specific add-on material but over recent years there has been more convergence between the international Code and ours which means that there is not a significant amount of additional content that is ICAEW-specific. This content is denoted in the Code as italic text so can be identified by a user reading through.

Areas of difference

The main areas where there are some additional ICAEW-specific material are as follows:

Fundamental principle of confidentiality S114

There are some additional paragraphs in section 114 in relation to the fundamental principle of confidentiality. The extracts of these are below:

114.0 A1 The principle of confidentiality is not only to keep information confidential, but also to take all reasonable steps to preserve confidentiality. Whether information is confidential or not will depend on its nature. A safe and proper approach for professional accountants to adopt is to assume that all unpublished information about a client’s or employer’s affairs, however gained, is confidential. Some clients or employers may regard the mere fact of their relationship with a professional accountant as being confidential.

114.2 A1 This requirement extends not only to clients, past and present, but also to third parties from or about whom information has been received in confidence. The principle of confidentiality clearly does not prevent an employee from using the skills acquired while working with a former employer in undertaking a new role with a different organisation. It would not be appropriate for professional accountants to either use or appear to use special knowledge which could only have been acquired with access to confidential information. It is a matter of judgment as to the dividing line which separates experience gained from special knowledge acquired.

Fundamental principle of professional behaviour S115

There are some additional paragraphs in section 115 in relation to the fundamental principle of professional behaviour. The extracts of these are below:

115.1 A2 The concept of professional behaviour implies that it is appropriate for professional accountants to conduct themselves with courtesy and consideration towards all with whom they come into contact when performing their work.

R115.3 Professional accountants shall never promote or seek to promote their services, or the services of other professional accountants, in such a way, or to such an extent, as to amount to harassment of a potential client or employer.

Professional handover S320

The section on professional handover has a substantive amount of additional material for ICAEW members. Much of this relates to the anti-money laundering requirements for members practising in the UK. The extracts of the additional paragraphs are below:

R320.5 Having been asked to accept an appointment, the professional accountant shall at least seek to contact the existing or predecessor accountant, irrespective of whether the existing or predecessor accountant works in public practice or not. This includes circumstances where the professional accountant is asked to undertake work which is relevant to the work of an ongoing existing accountant unless the client provides acceptable reasons why the existing accountant cannot be informed.

320.5 A1 A proposed accountant will usually need the client’s permission, preferably in writing, to initiate discussions with the existing or predecessor accountant.

320.5A2 Care must be taken when communicating all relevant facts to a proposed accountant in situations where the existing or predecessor accountant knows or suspects that their client is involved in money laundering or a terrorist activity. It is important that: - The proposed accountant does not specifically enquire whether the existing accountant has reported suspicions of money laundering or terrorism. Such questions place the existing accountant in a difficult position and are likely not to be answered. - The proposed accountant does not ask the existing accountant whether client identification or ‘knowing your client’ procedures have been carried out under anti-money laundering legislation. The proposed accountant has responsibility for obtaining information for client identification and ‘knowing your client’ and this cannot be delegated to the existing accountant.

320.6A1 The proposed accountant is entitled to assume that the existing accountant’s silence implies there was no adverse comment to be made, although this does not obviate the requirement in R320.6 to take other reasonable steps.

R320.7A If the client fails or refuses to grant the existing accountant permission to discuss the client’s affairs with the proposed accountant, the existing accountant shall report this fact to the proposed accountant who shall consider carefully the reason for such failure or refusal when determining whether or not to accept nomination/appointment.

R320.7B If the existing accountant has made one or more suspicious activity reports relating to money laundering or terrorism, the existing accountant shall not disclose that fact to the prospective accountant, or make other disclosures that could amount to tipping off.

320.7 A3 Disclosure of money laundering or terrorist suspicion reporting by the existing accountant to the proposed accountant needs to be avoided because this information may be discussed with the client or former client.

R320.7C An existing accountant shall deal promptly with any reasonable request for the transfer of records and may have the right of particular lien if there are unpaid fees.

R320.7D The prospective accountant often asks the existing accountant for information as to the client’s affairs. If the client is unable to provide the information and lack thereof might prejudice the client’s interests, such information shall be promptly given. In such circumstances, no charge shall normally be made unless there is good reason to the contrary.

320.7 A4 An example of a reason to make a charge would be that a significant amount of work is involved.

Fees and remuneration (including commission) S330; Agencies and referrals S331

The sections in the Code that deal with fees and remuneration and agencies and referrals are extensive, and a large part of this content is ICAEW add-on material. UK fiduciary law means that there are stricter requirements on our members in these areas than are imposed by the international code. Members are advised to review these sections in full – any ICAEW specific material is in italics.

Part 4 / section 400 onwards

ICAEW’s Code includes all IESBA code content on audit independence from section 400 onwards. While the ICAEW Code does not add to this material, the application of Part 4 of the Code depends on whether an audit is being carried out under UK ISAs – if so the UK FRC’s Ethical Standard applies for audit independence purposes. Further detail on the applicable independence requirements can be found at Auditor independence.

Other additional material

Readers of the Code will notice that there are endnotes and cross references added at the end of some sections. These tend to be in boxes and are ICAEW’s explanatory material rather than extra requirements for members.

Note: This summary seeks to highlight the main areas of difference between the ICAEW Code of Ethics published in January 2020, and the IESBA code of ethics published in 2018. It is not a comprehensive comparison of every possible difference between the two documents.