In its policy paper, HM Treasury set out five options for making the capital allowances regime more generous. Views were sought on which option could provide the greatest incentive for businesses to invest in capital infrastructure and equipment.
The faculty sought views from members, who overwhelmingly saw the current capital allowances regime as providing a reward for capital investment, rather than an incentive. In its response, the faculty highlighted that bringing forward the timing of the financial benefit would help to produce a more incentivising regime. For example, by providing grants for planned investment projects, or providing repayable tax credits, especially for loss-making companies.
It also considered that, by providing tax incentives for specific forms of expenditure, the regime could provide more incentives at a lower cost to the Exchequer. The response also looked at:
Is the government looking to incentivise large-scale infrastructure projects or help small businesses to grow? These markets will respond to very different incentives.
Is the government looking to do more to incentivise businesses to invest in environmentally friendly equipment as part of its net zero agenda? Could investment in advanced technologies assist with this, as well as enhance productivity?
Is the government considering the use of enterprise zones outside of the South East of England to assist with its levelling up agenda? What about brownfield sites or ailing high streets?
The response highlighted the need to re-examine the boundaries around what constitutes expenditure on capital equipment. Planning and project management costs relating to large-scale capital investment projects, for example, frequently attract no tax deductions at all. They are capital in nature, but do not constitute expenditure on plant or buildings. This can reduce the incentives available for such projects.
The final theme arising from the response was the need for greater certainty and consistency in the government’s capital allowances policy. It notes, for example, that the annual investment allowance has changed six times since its introduction in 2008. Rates of writing down allowances available in respect of plant and machinery pools have also frequently changed. Keeping rates and rules unchanged for a sustained period would help businesses to understand what allowances are available to them when planning investment projects.
Read ICAEW REP 54/22 in full.
ICAEW Know-How from the Tax Faculty
This guidance is created by the Tax Faculty, recognised internationally as a leading authority and source of expertise on taxation. The Faculty is the voice of tax for ICAEW, responsible for all submissions to the tax authorities. Join the Faculty for expert guidance and support enabling you to provide the best advice on tax to your clients or business.
More support on tax
ICAEW's Tax Faculty provides technical guidance and practical support on tax practice and policy. You can sign up to the Tax Faculty's free enewsletter (TAXwire) which provides weekly updates on developments in tax.Sign up for TAXwireJoin the Tax Faculty
The future of tax after COVID
As digital technologies transform society, the UK government is grappling with balancing the books while ensuring its tax system is fit for purpose. Join us as we take a look at the issues and challenges facing the tax system.Read more
More from the Tax Faculty
Stay up to date with the latest developments in tax by signing up to the Tax Faculty's weekly enewsletter
Comprehensive support for Tax practitioners each month from the Tax Faculty and expert contributors.
Expert advice from the Tax Faculty's technical managers on all the developments in tax policy and practice.